menu
safibta
Week 9 of 23

safibta commits to:
in the journal
8
0
Details
Last reported: Pending
Successful (pending referee feedback)
Next report due:
September 22
3:00 PM GMT
My Commitment Journal
safibta
safibta
August 16, 2019, 2:58 AM
For reference:‎ ‎ ‎
‎- Checklist for creating/updating this journal entry:‎ ‎ ‎
 Update the start time ‎ ‎
 Update the end time ‎ ‎
 Select all and copy ‎
 set alarms at t-1hr6min, t-1hr21min, and t-1hr51min titled stickk‎ ‎
 Upload the commitment to the journal ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎---‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
Start time: 2019-08-08 2359 in KST ‎ ‎
End time: 2019-08-09 2055 in KST ‎ ‎

Task(s):‎ ‎ ‎
‎- spend two Deep Work Stints doing work on PhD, i.e. do PhDx8 in two disjoint time intervals


Commitment:‎ ‎ ‎
The commitment is to accomplish the tasks stated above in ‎the ‎present ‎journal ‎entry ‎in ‎the ‎time ‎duration ‎from ‎the start time stated above in the present ‎journal ‎entry to ‎the ‎end ‎time ‎stated ‎above in ‎the present ‎journal ‎entry, and if this task is ‎not ‎accomplished, ‎the ‎commitment is ‎to ‎tear a ‎workable 5000 KRW ‎currency note ‎into at least ‎three ‎pieces before 2359 ‎in ‎KST on the ‎date ‎which ‎occurs exactly 24 hours after ‎the end time ‎stated in ‎the ‎present journal entry.‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
Notes applicable to the present journal entry:‎
‎- the present journal entry overrides all the previous journal entries in the present Stickk ‎commitment ‎ ‎
‎- Any update to the present Stickk commitment shall take 1 hour ‎to ‎take ‎effect ‎from ‎the ‎time ‎that ‎the ‎said ‎update is posted in the journal of the present ‎Stickk ‎commitment. In ‎the ‎said ‎‎1-hour ‎window, ‎the ‎Stickk ‎commitment shall stay as it was in the ‎past ‎instance.‎ ‎
‎- note that even if the start time mentioned in the present ‎journal ‎entry ‎has ‎passed, ‎the ‎commitment ‎shall ‎hold ‎true (e.g. say its 5 p.m. at the time of posting ‎the ‎journal ‎entry ‎and I want ‎to ‎have 2 hours ‎logged ‎between ‎‎4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m., the ‎commitment ‎shall be ‎valid at ‎the end ‎time)‎ ‎
‎- Deep Work Stint (abbreviated as DW) is defined here as it has been defined ‎in ‎the ‎most ‎recent ‎Stickk ‎commitment in my Stickk account containing the string “routine system” in ‎the ‎title ‎with ‎case ‎not considered ‎sensitive, whether that Stickk commitment is currently active, ‎dismissed, ‎or inactive.‎
- Note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold:
--- I must end this definition with a period.
--- I must write this definition of the considered loophole before exploiting the considered loophole.
--- This definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole.
--- I must put up a reminder in my PDA to prompt me to read the present journal entry in a near future SDEL (e.g. I can write: “SDEL: read infodiet commitment”)
- Note on specificity of clauses: Since it is mostly impossible for any commitment to be specific enough for the person committing to it to not be able to exploit a loophole in this commitment, the level of generality of each commitment in the present journal entry shall be considered of the level that is same as present level of specificity of the respective commitment.
- Relaxation clause: number of relaxation periods of any duration allowed for the present stick commitment is zero
safibta
safibta
August 9, 2019, 11:11 AM
For reference:‎ ‎ ‎
‎- Checklist for creating/updating this journal entry:‎ ‎ ‎
 Update the start time ‎ ‎
 Update the end time ‎ ‎
 Select all and copy ‎
 set alarms at t-1hr6min, t-1hr21min, and t-1hr51min titled stickk‎ ‎
 Upload the commitment to the journal ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎---‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
Start time: 2019-08-08 2359 in KST ‎ ‎
End time: 2019-08-09 2055 in KST ‎ ‎

Task(s):‎ ‎ ‎
‎- spend two Deep Work Stints doing work on PhD, i.e. do PhDx8 in two disjoint time intervals


Commitment:‎ ‎ ‎
The commitment is to accomplish the tasks stated above in ‎the ‎present ‎journal ‎entry ‎in ‎the ‎time ‎duration ‎from ‎the start time stated above in the present ‎journal ‎entry to ‎the ‎end ‎time ‎stated ‎above in ‎the present ‎journal ‎entry, and if this task is ‎not ‎accomplished, ‎the ‎commitment is ‎to ‎tear a ‎workable 5000 KRW ‎currency note ‎into at least ‎three ‎pieces before 2359 ‎in ‎KST on the ‎date ‎which ‎occurs exactly 24 hours after ‎the end time ‎stated in ‎the ‎present journal entry.‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
Notes applicable to the present journal entry:‎
‎- the present journal entry overrides all the previous journal entries in the present Stickk ‎commitment ‎ ‎
‎- Any update to the present Stickk commitment shall take 1 hour ‎to ‎take ‎effect ‎from ‎the ‎time ‎that ‎the ‎said ‎update is posted in the journal of the present ‎Stickk ‎commitment. In ‎the ‎said ‎‎1-hour ‎window, ‎the ‎Stickk ‎commitment shall stay as it was in the ‎past ‎instance.‎ ‎
‎- note that even if the start time mentioned in the present ‎journal ‎entry ‎has ‎passed, ‎the ‎commitment ‎shall ‎hold ‎true (e.g. say its 5 p.m. at the time of posting ‎the ‎journal ‎entry ‎and I want ‎to ‎have 2 hours ‎logged ‎between ‎‎4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m., the ‎commitment ‎shall be ‎valid at ‎the end ‎time)‎ ‎
‎- Deep Work Stint (abbreviated as DW) is defined here as it has been defined ‎in ‎the ‎most ‎recent ‎Stickk ‎commitment in my Stickk account containing the string “routine system” in ‎the ‎title ‎with ‎case ‎not considered ‎sensitive, whether that Stickk commitment is currently active, ‎dismissed, ‎or inactive.‎
- Note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold:
--- I must end this definition with a period.
--- I must write this definition of the considered loophole before exploiting the considered loophole.
--- This definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole.
--- I must put up a reminder in my PDA to prompt me to read the present journal entry in a near future SDEL (e.g. I can write: “SDEL: read infodiet commitment”)
- Note on specificity of clauses: Since it is mostly impossible for any commitment to be specific enough for the person committing to it to not be able to exploit a loophole in this commitment, the level of generality of each commitment in the present journal entry shall be considered of the level that is same as present level of specificity of the respective commitment.
safibta
safibta
August 8, 2019, 2:26 PM
For reference:‎ ‎ ‎
‎- Checklist for creating/updating this journal entry:‎ ‎ ‎
 Update the start time ‎ ‎
 Update the end time ‎ ‎
 Select all and copy ‎
 set alarms at t-1hr6min, t-1hr21min, and t-1hr51min titled stickk‎ ‎
 Upload the commitment to the journal ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎---‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
Start time: 2019-08-08 2359 in KST ‎ ‎
End time: 2019-08-09 2055 in KST ‎ ‎

Task(s):‎ ‎ ‎
‎- spend six Deep Work Stints doing work on PhD, i.e. do PhDx8 in six disjoint time intervals


Commitment:‎ ‎ ‎
The commitment is to accomplish the tasks stated above in ‎the ‎present ‎journal ‎entry ‎in ‎the ‎time ‎duration ‎from ‎the start time stated above in the present ‎journal ‎entry to ‎the ‎end ‎time ‎stated ‎above in ‎the present ‎journal ‎entry, and if this task is ‎not ‎accomplished, ‎the ‎commitment is ‎to ‎tear a ‎workable 5000 KRW ‎currency note ‎into at least ‎three ‎pieces before 2359 ‎in ‎KST on the ‎date ‎which ‎occurs exactly 24 hours after ‎the end time ‎stated in ‎the ‎present journal entry.‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
Notes applicable to the present journal entry:‎
‎- the present journal entry overrides all the previous journal entries in the present Stickk ‎commitment ‎ ‎
‎- Any update to the present Stickk commitment shall take 1 hour ‎to ‎take ‎effect ‎from ‎the ‎time ‎that ‎the ‎said ‎update is posted in the journal of the present ‎Stickk ‎commitment. In ‎the ‎said ‎‎1-hour ‎window, ‎the ‎Stickk ‎commitment shall stay as it was in the ‎past ‎instance.‎ ‎
‎- note that even if the start time mentioned in the present ‎journal ‎entry ‎has ‎passed, ‎the ‎commitment ‎shall ‎hold ‎true (e.g. say its 5 p.m. at the time of posting ‎the ‎journal ‎entry ‎and I want ‎to ‎have 2 hours ‎logged ‎between ‎‎4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m., the ‎commitment ‎shall be ‎valid at ‎the end ‎time)‎ ‎
‎- Deep Work Stint (abbreviated as DW) is defined here as it has been defined ‎in ‎the ‎most ‎recent ‎Stickk ‎commitment in my Stickk account containing the string “routine system” in ‎the ‎title ‎with ‎case ‎not considered ‎sensitive, whether that Stickk commitment is currently active, ‎dismissed, ‎or inactive.‎
- Note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold:
--- I must end this definition with a period.
--- I must write this definition of the considered loophole before exploiting the considered loophole.
--- This definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole.
--- I must put up a reminder in my PDA to prompt me to read the present journal entry in a near future SDEL (e.g. I can write: “SDEL: read infodiet commitment”)
- Note on specificity of clauses: Since it is mostly impossible for any commitment to be specific enough for the person committing to it to not be able to exploit a loophole in this commitment, the level of generality of each commitment in the present journal entry shall be considered of the level that is same as present level of specificity of the respective commitment.
safibta
safibta
August 8, 2019, 2:25 PM
For reference:‎ ‎ ‎
‎- Checklist for creating/updating this journal entry:‎ ‎ ‎
 Update the start time ‎ ‎
 Update the end time ‎ ‎
 Select all and copy ‎
 set alarms at t-1hr6min, t-1hr21min, and t-1hr51min titled stickk‎ ‎
 Upload the commitment to the journal ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎---‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
Start time: 2019-08-08 2359 in KST ‎ ‎
End time: 2019-08-09 2055 in KST ‎ ‎

Task(s):‎ ‎ ‎
‎- spend six Deep Work Stints doing work on PhD, i.e. do PhDx8 in six disjoint time intervals


Commitment:‎ ‎ ‎
The commitment is to accomplish the tasks stated above in ‎the ‎present ‎journal ‎entry ‎in ‎the ‎time ‎duration ‎from ‎the start time stated above in the present ‎journal ‎entry to ‎the ‎end ‎time ‎stated ‎above in ‎the present ‎journal ‎entry, and if this task is ‎not ‎accomplished, ‎the ‎commitment is ‎to ‎tear a ‎workable 5000 KRW ‎currency note ‎into at least ‎three ‎pieces before 2359 ‎in ‎KST on the ‎date ‎which ‎occurs exactly 24 hours after ‎the end time ‎stated in ‎the ‎present journal entry.‎ ‎
‎ ‎
‎ ‎
Notes applicable to the present journal entry:‎
‎- the present journal entry overrides all the previous journal entries in the prsent Stickk ‎commitment ‎ ‎
‎- Any update to the present Stickk commitment shall take 1 hour ‎to ‎take ‎effect ‎from ‎the ‎time ‎that ‎the ‎said ‎update is posted in the journal of the present ‎Stickk ‎commitment. In ‎the ‎said ‎‎1 ‎hour ‎window, ‎the ‎Stickk ‎commitment shall stay as it was in the ‎past ‎instance.‎ ‎
‎- note that even if the start time mentioned in the present ‎journal ‎entry ‎has ‎passed, ‎the ‎commitment ‎shall ‎hold ‎true (e.g. say its 5 p.m. at the time of posting ‎the ‎journal ‎entry ‎and I want ‎to ‎have 2 hours ‎logged ‎between ‎‎4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m, the ‎commitment ‎shall be ‎valid at ‎the end ‎time)‎ ‎
‎- Deep Work Stint (abbreviated as DW) is defined here as it has been defined ‎in ‎the ‎most ‎recent ‎Stickk ‎commitment in my Stickk account containing the string “routine system” in ‎the ‎title ‎with ‎case ‎not considered ‎sensitive, whether that Stickk commitment is currently active, ‎dismissed, ‎or inactive.‎
- Note on loopholes: I assume there are loopholes in all my Stickk commitments. When I exploit a loophole, in order for this loophole to be considered a valid reason for not incurring the penalty of the present Stickk commitment as defined in the present journal entry, I must state in digital or physical writing a satisfactory definition of the loophole that I have exploited in the considered instance. For this definition of the considered loophole to be considered valid, the following criteria must hold:
--- I must end this definition with a period.
--- I must write this definition of the considered loophole before exploiting the considered loophole.
--- This definition of the loophole must not cite a bulleting error as a source of exploitation of the exploited loophole.
--- I must put up a reminder in my PDA to prompt me to read the present journal entry in a near future SDEL (e.g. I can write: “SDEL: read infodiet commitment”)
- Note on specificity of clauses: Since it is mostly impossible for any commitment to be specific enough for the person committing to it to not be able to exploit a loophole in this commitment, the level of generality of each commitment in the present journal entry shall be considered of the level that is same as present level of specificity of the respective commitment.
    This Commitment has no photos.
Displaying 1-4 of 8 results.
September 9 to September 16
Successful (pending referee feedback)
Success
Pending
September 2 to September 9
Successful (referee feedback expired)
Success
No report submitted
August 26 to September 2
Successful (referee feedback expired)
Success
No report submitted
August 19 to August 26
Successful (referee feedback expired)
Success
No report submitted
Recipient of Stakes
Anti-charity (Political: American Crossroads (Super PAC supporting Republican Party))
To change the Recipient of Stakes for your goals Commitment, enter their email address or stickK username below.
Total at stake: $920.00
Stakes per period: $40.00
Remaining Stakes: $600.00
Total Money Lost: $40.00
Referee
Supporters
This Commitment doesn't have any Supporters yet!
.
Your feedback has been sent. Thank you!